07/28/09 11:08AM
before last year I thought Ben Rothlesburger was an average quarterback with a good defense. But after the superbowl performance I would have to put him right up there with the best quarterbacks in the league. If memory serve me correctly he did something in the superbowl that noone has done since Joe Montana in that he took a team trailing with little to no time left and lead them on a must have touchdown drive. Tom Brady gets many accolades but really he lead his superbowl teams the wins on final drives whne they were tied and got field goals from Vinateri, which is a big difference in pressure and quarterback quality.
-
Either that's a really good point or it's not comparing apples to apples. I'm just not sure which yet. Here's the possible flip side, as I see it: each of them did the same thing—they got what the team needed in the situation. Does the fact that Brady's situation didn't call for a touchdown to win mean that he couldn't have gotten one if he did need it? Hard to say. But you're definitely right: the difference in the situation does mean a definite difference in pressure on the QBs, respectively. -
Maybe that's why he was the highest paid player in the league last year, at $27 million. -
I've seen your bro up here in B'ham. When you coming up for a visit? Lets do dinner some time. Later.