Something Else ...
Here is the best non-testimonial argument IMHO for Something Else - which I call God, and you can call whatever you want. My contention is that the hypothesis of God is supportable from science alone.
Proposition #1: "What exists can be observed, and what is observed exists; not otherwise specified." This is the most basic law of science, without which science does not function as anything different than magical thinking. See also the "mechanical and chemical philosophy", "mathematical systemization" and especially "empiricism" on this page: (click).
Partial conclusion: something exists - all around us, including us, because we observe it so. Denying this is equivalent to denying the basis of all science.
Proposition #2: Known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics (click) says that "everything is constantly running down". This is why - for instance - your TV works (stipulating for the argument that you have an older one): because the electrons run down the charge gradient and hit the phosphorescent lining of your screen. It is also why your biological cells work, because the protons inside your mitochondria form a charge gradient - and run down that charge gradient - driving a molecular motor called the ATP-Synthase (click), which in turn supplies the trapped chemical energy that the rest of your body uses as currency (ATP), by acting as a iterative molding machine - alternately pressing ADP+P together, forming and releasing ATP. This process also produces heat, which is dissipated energy, and the heat is why the process runs by itself. Dissipation acts as a pull on the whole network.
Further conclusion: something not only exists, it has been winding down since the dawn of time -whenever that was- making everything happen. Denying this leads to magical thinking, as you can make anything you want happen without a cause by using energy from nowhere; denying it also removes the basis for understanding all electronics and biologics.
Proposition #3: Known as the First Law of Thermodynamics (click) states that "something doesn't come from nothing". This is why perpetual motion machines CANNOT work, and therefore DON'T work. It is also why nuclear energy costs a little bit of mass to release the pent up nuclear energy. And it is why various biological cell membrane proteins use up nutrition to form chemical gradients. All because One Thing is made from Another Thing. NEVER is an unspecified One Thing made from No Thing... The most recent evidence of this is political: energy - electricity in this case - doesn't come from no where; it comes from Oil, Nuclear sources, Coal, Hydroelectric, Wind, etc. If it COULD come from nowhere, then there would be no argument with regard to renewable resources ... and there would be an endless supply - the ultimate renewable resource.
Final conclusion: something exists, it has been running down, and it came from somewhere fully formed ... wound up. Denying this makes creation ex nihilo (click) literally possible, where it is currently only figuratively applied to the bible's Genesis account; denying this makes possible NOT the "let there be light" of the bible - where something is created by something (Everything Else is created by God) - BUT literally makes possible the creation of something from nothing at all (The Big Bang is created by Absolute Void).
Now the bit presupposed by all of this - including the scientific philosophical revolution - is that once you are presented with a sensible argument and no sensible way out, you succumb to the argument: the assumption of Intellectual Honesty (click).
If 1) something exists, 2) it has run down, 3) it came fully wound from something else ... what is Something Else?
Proposition #1: "What exists can be observed, and what is observed exists; not otherwise specified." This is the most basic law of science, without which science does not function as anything different than magical thinking. See also the "mechanical and chemical philosophy", "mathematical systemization" and especially "empiricism" on this page: (click).
Partial conclusion: something exists - all around us, including us, because we observe it so. Denying this is equivalent to denying the basis of all science.
Proposition #2: Known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics (click) says that "everything is constantly running down". This is why - for instance - your TV works (stipulating for the argument that you have an older one): because the electrons run down the charge gradient and hit the phosphorescent lining of your screen. It is also why your biological cells work, because the protons inside your mitochondria form a charge gradient - and run down that charge gradient - driving a molecular motor called the ATP-Synthase (click), which in turn supplies the trapped chemical energy that the rest of your body uses as currency (ATP), by acting as a iterative molding machine - alternately pressing ADP+P together, forming and releasing ATP. This process also produces heat, which is dissipated energy, and the heat is why the process runs by itself. Dissipation acts as a pull on the whole network.
Further conclusion: something not only exists, it has been winding down since the dawn of time -whenever that was- making everything happen. Denying this leads to magical thinking, as you can make anything you want happen without a cause by using energy from nowhere; denying it also removes the basis for understanding all electronics and biologics.
Proposition #3: Known as the First Law of Thermodynamics (click) states that "something doesn't come from nothing". This is why perpetual motion machines CANNOT work, and therefore DON'T work. It is also why nuclear energy costs a little bit of mass to release the pent up nuclear energy. And it is why various biological cell membrane proteins use up nutrition to form chemical gradients. All because One Thing is made from Another Thing. NEVER is an unspecified One Thing made from No Thing... The most recent evidence of this is political: energy - electricity in this case - doesn't come from no where; it comes from Oil, Nuclear sources, Coal, Hydroelectric, Wind, etc. If it COULD come from nowhere, then there would be no argument with regard to renewable resources ... and there would be an endless supply - the ultimate renewable resource.
Final conclusion: something exists, it has been running down, and it came from somewhere fully formed ... wound up. Denying this makes creation ex nihilo (click) literally possible, where it is currently only figuratively applied to the bible's Genesis account; denying this makes possible NOT the "let there be light" of the bible - where something is created by something (Everything Else is created by God) - BUT literally makes possible the creation of something from nothing at all (The Big Bang is created by Absolute Void).
Now the bit presupposed by all of this - including the scientific philosophical revolution - is that once you are presented with a sensible argument and no sensible way out, you succumb to the argument: the assumption of Intellectual Honesty (click).
If 1) something exists, 2) it has run down, 3) it came fully wound from something else ... what is Something Else?